Technique / Molecular Biology / DNA analysis techniques / DNA southern blot
Gene copy number by slot-blot hybridization
Gene copy number by slot-blot hybridization
I'm planning to use slot blot hybridization to calculate the gene
copy number in the genome. However, my slot blot give a very weak signal
even 50ug of genomic DNA was applied. Is there any possible casue for
this..?? I am using DIG labelling and chemiluminecence detection. The
system works fine for southern blot (using the same probe and genomic
DNA), which can detect a single copy gene using 5 - 10ug of genomic DNA.
So, I don't know what's wrong with the slot blot. Can anyone give any
suggestion??
Regards,
Lum
Newsgroup archive
Are you denaturing your genomic DNA before you apply it to the filter?
Colin Rasmussen
Newsgroup archive
Yes, by adding NaOH to final conc. of 0.4N and boil for 16 minutes.
However, after the slot blot process, I notice something stick on the
membrane. This is only observed in slot with high amount of DNA (e.g. 35ug) Is
that the DNA..?? And how should I fix the DNA on the membrane??
Regards,
Lum
Newsgroup archive
Hi,
How do you fix the DNA on the membrane? Sometimes, just drying the membrane
would be enough; but if you want a better fixation you may try to use UV
irradiation or heat fixation (placing the membrane in an incubator at 80ÂșC for
1.5-2 hours would do both a partial denaturation of the DNA and fixation to the
membrane).
regards, LluĂ-s
Newsgroup archive
I've try both UV-fixation and baking at 120C for 40 mins. Both of them have
similar result.
Regards,
Lum
Newsgroup archive
just try placing the nylong membrane after transfer in a microwave oven at
full setting (atleast 800W) for 2.45 min. This came in a NAR paper around
1991. I don't remember the exact reference, but it gives excellent fixing
and much better signals than UV crosslinking or hot oven fixing at 80C,
try this out.
bye
cheers
jakku
Newsgroup archive
Why would you add that amount of NaOH AND boil. Sounds pretty harsh to me. I'd
simply boil it for 10 minutes, cool in ice, and then apply to the blotter.
Colin
Newsgroup archive
> I'm planning to use slot blot hybridization to calculate the gene
> copy number in the genome. However, my slot blot give a very weak signal
> even 50ug of genomic DNA was applied. Is there any possible casue for
> this..?? I am using DIG labelling and chemiluminecence detection. The
> system works fine for southern blot (using the same probe and genomic
> DNA), which can detect a single copy gene using 5 - 10ug of genomic DNA.
> So, I don't know what's wrong with the slot blot. Can anyone give any
> suggestion??
I battled with the same problem trying to determine copy number in
transgenic animals.
Let me guess are you looking at mammalian genome? If so I suspect
that this approach will not work :-=(. There is too much negative DNA
in the way with large genomes.; the probe simply cannot find the
target. I eventually concluded that Southerns were the only way until
I could persuade someone to buy me a Quantitative PCR machine.
If you do find a solution please post it, it would be very useful
David
Newsgroup archive
Not true. I've done it using tissue culture cells transformed with a
plasmid, and I wanted to determine the copy number of the plasmid. One thing
that might also help is to RE digest the genomic DNA prior to denaturation
and blotting.
Colin
Newsgroup archive
Last update 17-Jan-2002, Rating of 4 votes.
Post your message in DNA southern blot forum
Write your comment
|
By Ranadheer
on 10-Apr-2008
Please suggest me a protocol for the determination of gene copy number by Realtime PCR |
|
By archana
on 16-Aug-2007
i want to know the copy no of a specific gene in plant genome.what appoarch should i follow? |
|
By senthil
on 15-Feb-2005
my question is that how to crosslink a plasmid to a protein? iwant a protocol of uv crosslinking using a ordinary uv light |
|
By vivek
on 12-Jan-2005
hai |
|
By Shalini Sharma
on 28-Apr-2004
i am looking for a protocol for determination of gene copy number in a transfected mammalian cell line,where amplification was done using MTX.I know that southern blot analysis can be used but can not figure out how copy number is to be calculated .If anyone can help,please. |
|
By tom
on 16-Feb-2004
I have some problems with determine the insert copy number using the southern blot method. I don't get any signal with 4 different probes and I use 10ug of DNA. However, I have a very strong signal in the controls, plasmid DNA. So the protocol works. Could someone please help me |
|
By krismenon
on 01-Apr-2003
I am looking for a protocol to determine the gene copy number in a transfectant cell line which has been subjected to gene amplification on MTX(Dhfr mediated). |
|
By Tracy
on 17-Jan-2002
Hi, |
Please Login or Register to Post

Hybridization buffer recipe

Genomic DNA Southern blot hybridization Alkaline Transfer Problem

Plasmid vector unspecific hybridization

Protein blocking solution for DNA hybridization

Digoxigenin DIG Southern Blots

DNA hybridization using 100 bp insert as probe

southern enigma

-
EGFR gene copy number assessment from areas with highest EGFR expression predicts response to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011 Jul 12;105(2):255-62
Increased insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor protein expression and gene copy number in small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2010 Dec;5(12):1905-11
Chromogenic in situ hybridization to detect EGFR gene copy number in cell blocks from fine-needle aspirates of non small cell lung carcinomas and lung metastases from colo-rectal cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010;29:125
Clinical array-based karyotyping of breast cancer with equivocal HER2 status resolves gene copy number and reveals chromosome 17 complexity. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:396
Epidermal growth factor receptor in glioblastomas: correlation between gene copy number and protein expression. Hum Pathol. 2010 Jun;41(6):815-23
Reliability of chromogenic in situ hybridization for epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number detection in non-small-cell lung carcinomas: a comparison with fluorescence in situ hybridization study. Lung Cancer. 2010 Mar;67(3):301-5